1
Home Assignment 7 / Re: Problem 3
« on: November 19, 2012, 09:55:51 PM »Calvin: it's a bit simpler to write out ((-1)^(n+1) +1) as 0 or 2!
p.s. I am envious of your skills in LaTeX
Me too. Pretty impressive.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Calvin: it's a bit simpler to write out ((-1)^(n+1) +1) as 0 or 2!
p.s. I am envious of your skills in LaTeX
In the last line, shouldn't the power to the second exponential be ikx instead of iky?
No--it is Fourier integral for $k\mapsto y$ (remember FT was by $y$). Calvin, WTH, why are you not defending your solution?
It is discussed in lecture 13. If you have the Strauss textbook, it is discussed in quite a bit of detail in chapter 4.3
See Appendix C and Appendix B.
I'm confused over why the sketches for the full Fourier series and the sine Fourier series are different. They have the same formula. I would have expected them both to look like the plot for the sine Fourier series. Thanks.
Calvin, if you type your solutions in LaTeX or TeX, you could post just the source fixing some discrepancies on the fly
I changed the .pdfs to png's for now, when I have some time later I'll try to massage the tex code into mathjax/forum format.
Aida: How did you do the integral?
He didn't. He used a fourier transform pair from part 1(a).
Yes, That's right!
By the way Zarak, I guess it is clear from my name that I am female!
Aida: How did you do the integral?